requestId:684c3dfcc767d3.50142700.
My destiny, power and the law of nature conform to the law (Part 1)
——Ask the authorization question from the Qinghua Daniel A. Bell
Author: Zhiqing
Source: Author Author Authorization Confucian Network First published
Time: December 12, 2018 AD
[Note from the cleaner: Daniel A. Bell in Qinghua Daniel A. Bell) taught that the teacher of the Chief Teacher of the Confucianism “political Confucianism” had gained something but was still confused. Therefore, in August 2008, he went to the Longfang Yangming Temple to visit the Chief Teacher. After several days of discussion, he analyzed the doubts. Teacher Yang Ruqing was here. Zeng Xueling, a department of Philosophy in Qinghua, has been published publicly to treat readers. Because the full text is longer, it is divided into two chapters, which is the previous chapter. 】
Zhi Jing: Tomorrow, Teacher Being will come to Yangming Temple to discuss and talk, and it is very welcome. We can discuss some Confucian academic issues. Now, please ask the teacher, the teacher, for the first time.
Betanning: The important question I want to ask is the problem that students often mention, because they often ask about “political Confucianism”.
As we all know, Confucianism is an elite-theoretical philosophy, which divides justice and gentlemen. Some students have questions about this. Why does such a division exist? Some students acknowledge this division, but the question is how to determine who is a righteous person and who is a gentleman? In addition, when Confucian asks people to wait for the appearance of the saint, some students will ask how to understand who is the saint?
Recalling history, most emperors only apply Confucianism. They are not true believers of Confucianism. Of course, we will not think that these emperors are real saints. The key to the problem is that if there were no real saints in history, then how can modern people infer when saints will appear? Even if a saint appears, how can we not know it?
Some students suggested how modern people can determine that “the way of heaven conforms to the laws”? “The common mind conforms to the law” has been verified and implemented for a long time, but “the way of heaven conforms to the law” is very abstract. How can modern people understand “the way of heaven conforms to the law”?
Zhi Jing: The teacher raised many questions in “Political Confucianism”, and each question was a serious problem in “Political Confucianism”. A little girl looked at her mobile phone with her head down and did not notice her coming in. All need detailed discussion. Then, we will discuss one by one question. According to the order of the questions asked by the Chief Teacher, let us discuss the question of how to distinguish between a righteous person and a gentleman.
First of all, we need to identify a fact, and it is difficult for people to divide the people into gentlemen in modern society.
According to Veber’s theory, the world in modern times has been urgently sexualized and secularized, and China has also been involved in thisAn emergency drama of sentimental and secularization cannot be made as an exception. One of the characteristics of sensory secularization is “eliminating charm”. One of the symbols of “eliminating charm” is that there are no prophets, so Veber said that modern times are the era without prophets.
In terms of China’s situation, perceptualization and secularization mean that there is no holy gift in reality, because holy gifts are “charm”, which are “Chrisma”-like characters, that is, prophets in Eastern religions. In other words, perceptual href=”https://twbabyhoney520.org/”>Integrity One of the most basic characteristics of secularization in politics is to dispel the sacred value of all political fields through inspiration of non-religious concepts, and to dispel the middle-level differences in all social fields through inspiration of equal concepts. Just as modern politics and society erases the natural differences and levels of human beings arising from their natural nature, people are regarded as three-dimensional people that are equal to everyone. Therefore, all systems such as human religion, politics, laws, economy, education, civilization, etc. must be built according to the principle of equal to everyone, and these systems ensure that people and people are equal to each other.
So, from the perspective of the modern teaching system, whether in the East or China, what is poured out is the inspirational thinking that everyone is equal. What the teachings show in content and system are the so-called “everyone is born equal”. In this way, the arithmetic concept of the gentleman and the sage in the Confucian area is flattened. People only understand that people are equal, and no longer understand that there is a difference between the gentleman and the sage in human beings.
In addition, this era did not leave space for outstanding figures in humans that conform to the laws in terms of thinking and conception, nor did it leave a fair position for elite figures in humans to have. Modern people do not recognize the grand difference between people and people in terms of potential consciousness and social structure, nor do they accept that this difference in life, mind and virtue and moral character has the meaning of political power distribution.
But in the view of Confucianism, on the contrary, the difference between life, mind and nature and virtue must not only be positively determined, and this difference also has the meaning of political power distribution. In other words, the difference between a gentleman and a saint in humans is the chaotic nature of Liuhe Biology, which is the natural real situation of human existence. Liuhe Biology will focus its spirit more on outstanding figures in humans, so that these outstanding figures can gain more political power because of their outstanding nature – ability – so that they can bear more social and political responsibility for the people.
So, not only should we positively determine the natural disagreement between people and people, but we should also establish social and political systems that guarantee that the righteous can gain power, so that the righteous can gain power with respect and serve the common people.
Of course, modern unrestrained political philosophers cannot fully deny that there are moral differences between people in their real life, but they do not acknowledge that they do not accept thatThis kind of poor moral character has the meaning of political power and system establishment in the dominant politics. The right to politicians rely on the recognition of the dominant will of the people, that is, universal choice, rather than the virtues that people have that are difficult to see in the general selection, nor is it based on the regulatory system that guarantees that the saints and righteous people can gain power.
We understand that virtue is divided into morality, virtue is rooted in human inner mind, virtue is seen more in human inner behavior, virtue cannot be deceived, and morality can be deceived. Of course, this does not mean that the complete denial of virtue can play a certain non-directional role in modern political politics, but it is just that the difference in human virtues does not have a direct certain or essential correlation with the distribution of political power in modern political politics, that is, virtue will not have a real effect on the political power gained by the sages. This is the most basic political thinking that everyone is equal to is unrestrained – the difference in morality between people and people does not have the meaning of political power distribution.
This kind of thinking reaction [Time Travel/Rebirth] “Hooking up with a Big Boss with Beauty” [Complete + Extra] In terms of political situation, it constitutes the “popular people’s politics” that denies the rule of human virtue elites – the political rule of the common people. In Confucianism, it constitutes the “people’s politics” that denies “sage politics” and the “gentleman’s politics” that denies “correct people’s politics”.
However, the modern teaching system is not only in China or in the East, but is basically designed according to the concept of equality and inspiration of sentiment. Therefore, the people who teach the teaching do not recognize the elites with virtue and superiority of human beings – the “saints” or “righteous people” in China, they are called Confucianism, the “prophets” of Hebrew or the “fools” of Platz in the East, and they do not recognize the natural right of these elites to gain political power.
It is precisely because of this teaching landscape that the question raised by the students of the Chief Teachers, that is, how to determine the difference between saints and gentlemen and ordinary people, because students no longer have the same inspirational concepts that everyone is born equally posed.
In the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the Age of the
發佈留言